|
Comparing Dilatant Technology to
Propellant and Common Explosives Techniques
Propellants and Gun Powders
During the burning process (deflagration) of solid propellants or gun powders build-up pressure of
generated gas (which is the main force for cracking in such technologies) does not exceed 10,500 Psi per second.
Unconfirmed reports from competitors claim to generate, as much as, 25,000 Psi.

Figure 1. Change of generated
pressure P in time, during burning (deflagration) of propellants and gun powders under hydrostatic
stress Ps, where initial amplitude Pm does not go over 50 MPa and
impulse duration reach 2 seconds.
Because gas pressure is growing with such slow speed usually no more than 2 of two directional vertical
fractures are created. According to a Lame problem, wave’s attenuation is inversely proportional to the square of the
distance from the cylindrical charge
( ) and to
the cube of the distance from the shaped
( ) charge:
and
Where:
- is wave’s attenuation

- is initial pressure created by the products of burning or detonation process

- is the distance from the center of charge to the point where maximum principal stress was measured
Bedrocks vary in strength and gas will find weak point where cracking begins under advanced conditions.
As propagation of initial fractures progress gas will be consumed fester than propellants can generate it, as a result
no new fractures can be created.
Gas consumption will continue until pressure decrease to certain level at which fractures grows stops.
This process explained by the law of A. Griffith:

Where:

- is uniaxial tensile strength of the rock

- is the free surface energy per unit area

- is a Young’s modulus

- is the length of a fracture propagated in one direction
Click on this link to check references:
Microcracks and Shear Fracturing
Common Explosives
The detonation of common explosives create an impulse or wave that attenuate according to a law
and
Where:
,
and
are experimental factors

- is maximum principal stress
- is mass of the charge

- is index of the symmetry of explosion

Figure 2. Stress state of the
rock created by the detonation of the shaped charge (Common explosive methods)
Line 1 -
Line 2 -
Line 3 -
Where:

- is maximum principal stress

- is amplitude value of radial component

- is minimum principle stress

- is time as a part of the total wave duration

- is differential stress
From Figure 2 we can see that value of vary from 0.34 to 0.58 and its average is 0.4. It is slightly higher than its value under effective normal stress:

Where:

- is Poisson’s ratio
It means that reach parameters,
when main deformation force is the force of compression.
This residual stress of common explosives can actually reduce permeability of the rock near wellbore.

Figure 3. Volumetric deformation
of the sandstone with its strength from 85.5 to 106 MPa
Where:
Line 1 is compressive deformation with
value
= 1 common explosives
Line 2 is compressive deformation with
value
= 0.165 common explosives
Line 3 is beginning of dilation with
value
= 0.12 common explosives
Line 4 is dilatant deformation with
value
= 0.1 SWTorpedo
Line 5 is dilatant deformation with
value
= 0 SWTorpedo
In the Figure 3 we can observe compressive deformation and its decline.
The decline of compressive deformation and increase in rock’s volume is due to decrease
of value of .
Quotation:
Rock fracture in shear depends on microcrack propagation where the propagation is caused by tensile stresses.
Where are the tensile stresses generated when rock is deep within the crust of the earth?
The answer is that on a microscopic scale grains press against each other at sharp contacts.
These contacts are called "stress risers". Under these microscopic contacts very large tensile stresses can be
generated even though the whole-rock stress in highly compressive.
Click on this link to check references:
Chapter 9
Mechanics of Fracturing and Faulting
Only dilatant technology will justify commercial applications of high explosives to
deliver cost-effective increase in well's productivity by increasing permeability 200% or more.
Dilatant Increase of Rock’s Permeability by Using High Explosives
The laboratorial and field experiments confirm that dilatancy begin when
( ζ = σφ/σr ) < 0.1 and it will
progress when ζ value will be approaching negative 1.0 and will reach its peak when ζ
value is negative 1.0 in the areas where: σr at its amplitude and the amplitude is not lower
then 3% of the rock’s uniaxial compressive strength.

Figure 4. Distinctive
characteristics of the dilatant stress state created by SWTorpedo during its detonation.
In Figure 4 displayed registered tensile stress and rock fracturing in shear when 2 stage SWTorpedo
with cumulative TNT amount of 8lb was used, where distance
( )
from the center of the charge to the point where maximum principal stress
was measured is 3ft. Dash line shows the how θ (volumetric deformation) is vary with change in
ζ value. During detonation of SWTorpedo compressive volumetric deformation appears only in the
initial stage of wave’s propagation when maximum principal stress as low as 17.5MPa or 23.3% of its amplitude value.
In the short period of time differential stress begin to grow rapidly and at the amplitude value of wave’s
propagation reach value of 0 (ζ → 0) which is approximates uniaxial stress and continued decline of
amplitude value of wave’s propagation reaches value of negative 1 it is close to "ideal" shearing
(ζ → -1) (area Ι, and
ΙΙ).
Rock’s dilatant volume increase unconditionally connected to the increase of its permeability
by creating new
pore channels and increasing existing pore space.


Figure 5. Volumetric deformation
of strong sandstone and change in its permeability under uneven stress state created by SWTorpedo:
Where:
Line 1 - ζ = 0.08
Line 2 - ζ = 0.12
Line 3 - ζ = 0.5
| 
Figure 6. Volumetric deformation
of a limestone and change in its permeability under uneven stress state created by SWTorpedo:
Where:
Line 1 - ζ = 0.04
Line 2 - ζ = 0.15
Line 3 - ζ = 0.4
|
By comparing progressing dilatancy for the strong sandstone depicted in Figure 5 or for the limestone
depicted
in Figure 6 to the increase in the rock’s permeability we can see its dependence and how it is vary with the
rock’s
characteristics.
Demonstrated stimulations of 19 potentially productive intervals for oil and gas wells in USA,
by applying SWTorpedo, proved to be effective 96% of the time, when rock properties known and
hydrocarbons in place.
Appropriate application of the exact amount of explosives and the regime of a detonation is the key to optimizing the
results of this new stimulation technique. The residual positive effect of applying our technique will likely last more
than 4 years and should normally increase yields by up to 4 times for oil wells, up to 10 times for gas wells and
up to 12 times for irrigation wells.
During post treatment observations no recompression of micro fractured rock has been detected.
The SWTorpedo well stimulation services requires the use of only small amounts of explosives resulting
in no damage to the casing string. When it is necessary, casing protection is provided.
|